This week the only reading I did was for my other English class. We read the
book Paddy Clarke Ha Ha Ha by Roddy Doyle (be ready for a lot of Irish
lit this semester), and I can't say that I was a particularly big fan of the
book. For some brief context, the book follows the story of a ten-year-old boy—Paddy
Clarke—growing up in Ireland in the late 1960s. It is told from Paddy's point
of view as he tries to navigate and make sense of his everyday life, social
norms with the boys at school, and his parents' increasingly tumultuous (and
eventually violent) relationship.
I have to say that I had a hard time connecting with this story and its
characters at first. Paddy and the other boys had a penchant for violence and
overall were not particularly likeable, and I was left feeling a little cold
just because of the seeming randomness and pointlessness of Paddy's rambly
mundane stories about fights at school and picking on his little brother. It
wasn't until the last third or so of the book that I began to appreciate what
was happening narratively. The instances of violence served a function within
the story, providing context for a key trend: as the tension and violence became
more pronounced in Paddy’s home, there was a noticeable shift in Paddy’s behavior
toward others. The inverse relationship between the increasing violence between
Paddy’s parents and Paddy’s decreasing violence toward his peers called
attention to the book’s themes of childhood trauma and domestic violence in a
way that helped the reader parse out the true depth of the effects of these
forces. Perhaps what is most poignant about the book is that, since everything
is told from Paddy’s point of view, we are grappling with these difficult ideas
and situations via a ten-year-old’s understanding of them: his thoughts and
feelings as he tries to make sense of why and how these things are happening
between people he loves, between people who are supposed to love each other,
and how he fits into that picture. While it’s still not one of my favorite
books I’ve ever read, it’s certainly a powerful one.
On another topic, after our discussion in class last week about book covers,
I’ve been thinking about book presentation specifically as it relates to the last
book I read, Educated by Tara Westover (which I wrote about in my blog
last week). This book cover interests me in particular simply because of the sheer
number of awards and accolades that are lauded on the cover of the book:
Both the front and back covers list the book’s various achievements—the back
cover even lists an entire paragraph of sources that named the book one of the
best books of the year. While it’s certainly not uncommon for book covers to display
promotional blurbs and relevant awards, this is one of the more prevalent
examples of this that I’ve seen. Personally, I know that I don’t pay a lot of
attention to blurbs and awards, especially considering how many books feature
these types of displays on their covers. But that made me curious about whether
others will become pick a book off the shelf or buy a book simply based on (or
at least partially based on) the person who has praised the book or the types
of awards it has won. Does anyone notice or put stock in these things, or do
people tend to overlook them as much as I do?
No comments:
Post a Comment